Daniel Bwala, special adviser to President Bola Tinubu on
policy communication, engaged in a heated exchange with Rufai Oseni, co-host of
The Morning Show on Arise Television.
The confrontation began when Oseni raised questions about
reports suggesting Bwala had been demoted from his initial position as
presidential spokesperson.
Bwala was announced as special adviser on media and public
communications on 14 November.
Afterwards, Bwala told journalists at the State House that
he would be taking over from Ajuri Ngelale, the former spokesperson to the
president.
But a clarification from the presidency indicated that the
president would have three spokespersons — Bwala, Bayo Onanuga, and Sunday
Dare.
During Tuesday’s interview, Oseni pressed Bwala on the
alleged demotion, prompting a critique of his questioning style.
Bwala denied being corrected by any individual regarding his
role, insisting that the clarification came from the presidency.
Advertisement
“You cannot control me or talk to me like a secondary school
student. If you ask a question, park and listen to the answer,” he said.
“Ordinarily I would have said it is none of your business
but I would help you, my office is 101 in the state house, presidential villa.
“I am a special adviser to the president. I was initially
announced as special adviser on media public communication, redesigned to
special adviser on policy communication, status special adviser, no demotion,
the same.
“I had unfettered access to the president last week and we
had a meeting. You said Sunday Dare and Bayo Onanuga corrected me, that’s
wrong, it was a press statement that came from the presidency and there was no
specific individual that corrected me.
“I’m still a presidential spokesman. The statement that was
issued said instead of one there are three presidential spokesmen.”
He also dismissed his previous criticisms of Tinubu while he
was a member of the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).
“I was in the opposition. In case you don’t know, the rule
of the opposition is to oppose the government. In doing so, you de-emphasize
the strength of the government and emphasize your strength,” he said.
“Where they have strength, you allow them to argue their
matter. They raise their case in their own strength and not in the weakness of
the opposition.
“When I made the decision on the 10th of January after I visited the president, from that time till now, I speak well of the president and support his activities.”