Shares of Anil Ambani-led Reliance Power jumped 3.5% to their day’s high of Rs 37.74 on the BSE on Wednesday as the company got relief from the Delhi High Court granting a stay on SECI notice of debarment against the company.“Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in its hearing held today has granted stay on notice of debarment and public notice issued by SECI against the Company including all its subsidiaries except Reliance NU BESS Limited (formerly known as Maharashtra Energy Generation Limited),” the company said in its exchange filing.Earlier this month, Reliance Power informed that it received a notice from Solar Energy Corporation of India Limited (SECI) directing that the company, including its subsidiaries, be debarred from participating in all future tenders issued by the organization for three years.Solar Energy Corporation of India had barred Reliance Power and its arm Reliance NU BESS from participating in its tenders for submission of fake documents in its bids.Following this update, the shares of Reliance Power had closed 5% higher at Rs 36.46 on the BSE in the previous trading session.In a notice dated November 13, SECI said on account of the submission of a fake endorsement of a foreign Bank Guarantee (BG) as part of its bid submission, it was discovered that the said BG submitted by Reliance NU BESS Ltd. (known as Maharashtra Energy Generation Ltd. at the time of bid submission), was also fake.Also read: NTPC Green IPO shares to debut today. Check GMP and analyst predictions for listingAccording to the notice, Reliance NU BESS had submitted a BG purportedly issued by the FirstRand Bank, through its branch supposed to be located in Manila City, Manila, the Philippines.Upon detailed investigation, it was confirmed by the Indian branch of the above Bank, that there does not exist any such branch of the bank in the Philippines, leading SECI to conclude that the BG submitted was a fake document.(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)