MANCHESTER UNITED Supporters Trust (MUST) raised concerns today about what the building of a new stadium might mean for fans.

Plans for a striking 100,000-capacity ground, constructed as the centrepiece of a wider regeneration project, were revealed in London this morning.

The announcement came two days after a major fans’ protest against increased ticket prices and the wider running of the club, while United continue to struggle on the pitch.

A MUST spokesperson said: “The announcement of plans to build a brand new stadium adjacent to Old Trafford is clearly very big news for United fans.

“Everyone wants the biggest and the best for our club and the visuals look both stunning and exciting.

“But, against the backdrop of uncertainty around next year’s ticket prices, continuing poor performance on the field, speculation around sales of key young players, and the recent financial results, the news probably does beg more questions than it gives clear answers.

“As our own and the club’s consultations have shown, the answer to whether United fans want to refurbish Old Trafford or build a new ground depends entirely on what the consequences of the decision are.

“So, now that decision has been made, fans will need to be consulted all along the way on the key features that impact match-going fans’ experience and atmosphere.

“Whilst investment is much needed and welcome, fans remain anxious about what it means and what the consequences will be.

“Will it drive up ticket prices and force out local fans? Will it harm the atmosphere, which is consistently fans’ top priority in the ground?

“Will it add to the debt burden which has held back the club for the last two decades? Will it lead to reduced investment in the playing side at a time when it is so badly needed?

“We look forward to further consultation with supporters and discussing these vital questions with the club.”

Fan group The 1958 strongly criticised the design of the new stadium, branding it “circus-like” and “soulless.”

“Manchester United’s new stadium design fails to reflect the club’s deep rooted heritage, traditions and connection to its supporters,” the group said in a statement.

“Instead of embodying the gritty, historic essence of Old Trafford, a fortress built on generations of passion, emotion and belonging, the design resembles a generic, soulless corporate structure, more akin to a modern entertainment venue than a football cathedral.

“Its circus-like aesthetic disregards the club’s working-class origins and the identity of a fanbase that spans generations.

“Rather than honouring the past and strengthening the bond with the local community, it prioritises spectacle over substance, alienating those who have defined United’s legacy for decades.

“It’s an events stadium over a football stadium. It’s a visitor experience over fan opinion and needs.

“Where was the consultation with fans on this design? What does the supporter configuration look like? We don’t need a copy of a Wembley of the north with a pretend Wembley Way, we need an Old Trafford of the north. A stadium that reflects our industrial and working-class heritage, and this is not it.

“We have already initiated a strategy on finding out exactly what has happened here along with some other important questions: Who will pay for this build and how? No reference to history or tradition – why?

“With the Glazer debt standing at £750million, what impact will that have on funding? Will this fall on the fans and local community to subsidise over future generations? Will the Glazers be removed before a spade hits the soil?”