Speaking on Channels Television’s Politics Today, the ex-
minister said President Bola Tinubu and his predecessor, Olusegun Obasanjo, had
taken similar steps, raising concerns about a return to military-style
governance.
Ogbeh warned that the practice could send a damaging message
to Nigerians about the ability of civilian leaders to govern themselves.
“The only other thing that I’m asking is: Why is it that
each time there is this suspension of a governor, a military person is put back
in place?” he asked.
“Do we miss military rule or are we suggesting that
civilians are incapable of governing themselves?
“Obasanjo did it twice, in fact, thrice, and we have it
again. What’s the logic? This is why, in the first place, this whole imposition
of a state of emergency should be avoided.
“Since the constitution doesn’t say you can only pick this
or that person, the president is free to do so, but it’s also sending a funny
signal that civilians can’t do the job themselves.
“That’s not a good one. That’s why civilians themselves
should be more responsible. Elected individuals should behave themselves and
not carry on as if it’s a holiday and that they can do as they wish because
they are sending the wrong signal to society.”
On March 18, Tinubu declared a state of emergency in Rivers,
citing the protracted political crisis and vandalisation of oil facilities.
The president also suspended Siminalayi Fubara, the state
governor; Ngozi Odu, his deputy; and members of the state assembly.
Tinubu nominated Ibok-Ete Ibas, a retired vice-admiral, as
the sole administrator of Rivers.
On March 20, the senate and the house of representatives
controversially ratified Tinubu’s request for the emergency rule.
The presidency had said that the decision was to prevent
further escalation of the political crisis in the south-south state.
Several stakeholders, including the south-south governors’
forum, have condemned the emergency rule in Rivers.