In two rulings on Friday, a three-member panel of the
appellate court rejected the objection by Kalu and his firm, Slok Nigeria
Limited to the application for leave to appeal out of time filed by the federal
government through the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC.
Kalu and Slok had argued, among others that the Court of
Appeal, having delivered a judgment on March 6, 2024, striking out an earlier
appeal by the federal government, the court had become functus officio and
could not longer take any further steps on the case.
Justice Ishaq Sanni, who read the rulings on Friday, noted
that the March 6, 2024 judgment did not determine the substance of the appeal
and thus, was not a judgment given on the merit.
Justice Sanni held that the Court of Appeal, in the March 6,
2024 judgment only struck out the appeal on the grounds that the record of
appeal was not properly certified, because the official of the Federal High
Court, who certified the record did not include his or her designation.
He held that since the March 6, 2024 judgment was delivered
after the three months allowed an aggrieved party to appeal, the federal
government was in order to have filed its application for extension of time to
appeal.
Justice Sanni proceeded to issue an order extending the time
within which the federal government should file a notice of appeal against the
September 29 judgment of the Federal High Court.
He also ordered the federal government to file its notice of
within 14 days.
The rulings were on the appeals marked:
CA/ABJ/PRE/ROA/CV/430MI/2024 (FRN v. Orji Uzo Kalu and two others) and
CA/ABJ/PRE/ROA/CV/431MI/2024 )FRN v. Slok Nigeria Limited and two others.