In a post on his X account on Sunday, Abubakar said his
policy reforms would have “protected our fragile economy against a much deeper
crisis by preventing business collapse”.
He criticised President Bola Tinubu’s administration for
removing the petrol subsidy, floating the exchange rate, and increasing the
electricity tariff, describing it as “overkill”.
The former vice-president said he would have led “by
example” and “first eliminate revenue leakages arising from governance,
including the cost of running the government and the government procurement
process”.
He added that his administration would have “adopted
alternative approaches to conflict resolution such as diplomacy, intelligence,
improved border control, deploying traditional institutions, and good
neighbourliness”.
Abubakar said he would have created an economic stimulus
fund (ESF) “with an initial investment capacity of approximately US$10 billion
to support MSMEs across all economic sectors”.
The former vice-president said although he advocated for the
removal of petrol subsidy, his administration would have adopted “a gradualist
approach” to the implementation of the reforms.
“Subsidies would not
have been removed suddenly and completely. It is instructive that when I was
Vice President, we adopted a gradualist approach and had completed phases 1 and
2 of the reform before our tenure ended,” he wrote.
Abubakar said his administration would have a
“managed-floating system” of foreign exchange.
“A fixed exchange rate system was out of the question
because it would not be in line with our philosophy of running an open, private
sector-friendly economy,” he said.
“On the other hand, given Nigeria’s underlying economic
conditions, adopting a floating exchange rate system would be an overkill.
“We would have
encouraged our central bank to adopt a gradualist approach to FX management. A
managed-floating system would have been a preferred option.”